Smallest linux distro? - Printable Version +- nixers (https://nixers.net) +-- Forum: Operating Systems & Administration (https://nixers.net/Forum-Operating-Systems-Administration) +--- Forum: Other *nix-like OSes & POSIX related (https://nixers.net/Forum-Other-nix-like-OSes-POSIX-related) +--- Thread: Smallest linux distro? (/Thread-Smallest-linux-distro) |
Smallest linux distro? - deadgone - 13-12-2015 What would you guys say is the *smallest* linux (libre or not) distro there is? I was looking at rlsd2 recently but I found it unsuitable. Interested in hearing all of your opinions on this subject. RE: Smallest linux distro? - Wildefyr - 13-12-2015 TinyCoreLinux is probably the smallest. RE: Smallest linux distro? - venam - 14-12-2015 I've used TinyCore and rlsd2, both pretty small. However, when it comes to the usage of small distro what I want is to be able to boot from a usb and directly be able to have a running system. Slitaz is my main small distro choice, though not the smallest. I guess in the bsd area you find smaller installs that can be put on a diskette. RE: Smallest linux distro? - arcetera - 26-12-2015 TinyCore, rlsd, and Damn Small Linux are probably the smallest. For most uses something like SliTaz should be small *enough*. RE: Smallest linux distro? - ninjacharlie - 26-12-2015 Linux From Scratch (also the most hardcore distro) ;) RE: Smallest linux distro? - strang3quark - 26-12-2015 I've used Tiny Core, I like the frugal mode. The "bad" thing about tiny core are the repos, you'll probably need to compile and make some packages. RE: Smallest linux distro? - z3bra - 26-12-2015 (26-12-2015, 12:28 PM)ninjacharlie Wrote: Linux From Scratch (also the most hardcore distro) ;) LFS is not *that* hardcore in fact. Its pretty much like arch actually. If you can read up a guide, copy paste some commands and avoid being stupid, you can get an LFS setup in less than a day (depending on your computer power). Also, its rather "big" due to the fact that most tools featured are GNU softwares compiled with sane defaults. A full alpine setup would be drastically smaller I think (busybox based) RE: Smallest linux distro? - apk - 26-12-2015 https://github.com/pikhq/bootstrap-linux RE: Smallest linux distro? - ninjacharlie - 27-12-2015 (26-12-2015, 06:25 PM)z3bra Wrote: Also, its rather "big" due to the fact that most tools featured are GNU softwares compiled with sane defaults. A full alpine setup would be drastically smaller I think (busybox based) When I've done it, I've never used the GNU suggestions they have for software. I've always grabbed stuff from suckless.org/suckless alternatives, and figured it out from there, so it's a bit more hardcore ;) RE: Smallest linux distro? - XcelQ - 24-01-2016 linux from scartch. RE: Smallest linux distro? - z3bra - 25-01-2016 (24-01-2016, 01:44 PM)XcelQ Wrote: linux from scartch. As I said, like, 3 posts above: (26-12-2015, 06:25 PM)z3bra Wrote: LFS is not *that* hardcore in fact. Its pretty much like arch actually. If you can read up a guide, copy paste some commands and avoid being stupid, you can get an LFS setup in less than a day (depending on your computer power). RE: Smallest linux distro? - XcelQ - 25-01-2016 \ (25-01-2016, 01:14 PM)z3bra Wrote:(24-01-2016, 01:44 PM)XcelQ Wrote: linux from scartch. I got arch in like 10 minutes. lfs probably takes longer. RE: Smallest linux distro? - z3bra - 26-01-2016 It obviously does, but that's mostly due to the compilation time. RE: Smallest linux distro? - arcetera - 04-03-2016 doesn't a minimal alpine docker container take ~5.5MB? RE: Smallest linux distro? - z3bra - 04-03-2016 We're talking about docker containers, not actual distros though. so you don't have the kernel, modules and other things RE: Smallest linux distro? - arcetera - 04-03-2016 ah; I've never used Docker so I didn't know that |