links2 (textual) vs dillo (graphical) - Printable Version +- nixers (https://nixers.net) +-- Forum: Desktop Customization, Efficiency, and Aesthetics (https://nixers.net/Forum-Desktop-Customization-Efficiency-and-Aesthetics) +--- Forum: Desktop Customization & Workflow (https://nixers.net/Forum-Desktop-Customization-Workflow) +--- Thread: links2 (textual) vs dillo (graphical) (/Thread-links2-textual-vs-dillo-graphical) |
links2 (textual) vs dillo (graphical) - lee - 21-04-2013 IMO links2 is the winner. It just looks SO much cleaner. I'd be glad to do more of these tests if anyone is interested. -Lee RE: links2 (textual) vs dillo (graphical) - venam - 21-04-2013 links2 RE: links2 (textual) vs dillo (graphical) - Mafia - 21-04-2013 (21-04-2013, 03:34 PM)NeoTerra Wrote: links2 by a long shot. ^ RE: links2 (textual) vs dillo (graphical) - j0lly - 22-04-2013 (21-04-2013, 01:28 PM)venam Wrote: links2 is that the framebuffer version with gtk? I used it for some times and run very well! Have to say i never tried Dillo, but link2 is very powerful browser! RE: links2 (textual) vs dillo (graphical) - venam - 22-04-2013 (22-04-2013, 04:25 AM)j0lly Wrote:gtk? What do you mean? This runs like that, in a framebuffer, without X.(21-04-2013, 01:28 PM)venam Wrote: links2 RE: links2 (textual) vs dillo (graphical) - Okeg - 22-04-2013 w3m masterrace! RE: links2 (textual) vs dillo (graphical) - zygotb - 22-04-2013 Links2 looks nicer. RE: links2 (textual) vs dillo (graphical) - Mafia - 23-04-2013 (22-04-2013, 11:47 AM)Vizaari Wrote: w3m masterrace! ^ RE: links2 (textual) vs dillo (graphical) - Dritz - 26-04-2013 I've used links2, dillo, and w3m. links2 > w3m > dillo I use 'links2 -g' all the time on my debian ancient computer. w3m is still nice for the textual simplicity when I'm reading a manual or something. I've heard some people use it for HTML parsing. Interesting... |