package management discussion - Programming On Unix

Users browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)
jkl
Long time nixers
The only relevant problem here might be that it affects portability in a negative way. I agree that the historical file system hierarchy in Unix and wannabe-Unix was broken from the moment when binaries were spilling into /usr. Only one of the things where Plan 9 excels: /usr is for users, period.

edit: I shouldn’t type before my third cup of coffee.

--
<mort> choosing a terrible license just to be spiteful towards others is possibly the most tux0r thing I've ever seen


Messages In This Thread
package management discussion - by sth - 26-05-2020, 05:55 PM
RE: package management discussion - by z3bra - 26-05-2020, 07:00 PM
RE: package management discussion - by sth - 26-05-2020, 07:18 PM
RE: package management discussion - by z3bra - 26-05-2020, 07:35 PM
RE: package management discussion - by sth - 26-05-2020, 07:41 PM
RE: package management discussion - by sth - 26-05-2020, 09:41 PM
RE: package management discussion - by venam - 27-05-2020, 01:51 AM
RE: package management discussion - by z3bra - 27-05-2020, 03:49 PM
RE: package management discussion - by sth - 28-05-2020, 06:05 PM
RE: package management discussion - by z3bra - 28-05-2020, 08:10 PM
RE: package management discussion - by jkl - 29-05-2020, 03:58 AM
RE: package management discussion - by z3bra - 29-05-2020, 05:18 AM
RE: package management discussion - by ckester - 29-05-2020, 05:24 PM
RE: package management discussion - by movq - 31-05-2020, 02:47 AM
RE: package management discussion - by z3bra - 31-05-2020, 04:14 AM
RE: package management discussion - by sth - 31-05-2020, 05:28 PM
RE: package management discussion - by jkl - 01-06-2020, 06:06 AM
RE: package management discussion - by movq - 01-06-2020, 02:26 PM
RE: package management discussion - by eadwardus - 05-07-2020, 02:32 PM