Fun with domain names - The WWW
Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)
|
|||
(26-08-2020, 10:55 AM)vain Wrote: Why? What is/was a legitimate use case for this form? While the previous IDN is valid as host writing, using the concept of domain to ascii or IDNA, the ipv4 representation isn't actually valid as far as the URL standard goes but it seems to still be interpreted by the browser, cURL, and others. You can even represent it as hex: http://0xb23eec50 or octal: http://026217566120 So I have found at which level it is done, it's also from something getaddrinfo calls. I've found the culprilt, it is inet_aton(3). Relevant from the manpage, but not compatible with URL specs: Code: inet_aton() converts the Internet host address cp from the IPv4 numbers-and-dots One thing is sure in computing, it's that standards are only ideals. |
|||
Messages In This Thread |
Fun with domain names - by venam - 24-08-2020, 08:25 AM
RE: Fun with domain names - by z3bra - 24-08-2020, 09:23 AM
RE: Fun with domain names - by venam - 24-08-2020, 09:26 AM
RE: Fun with domain names - by s0kx - 24-08-2020, 12:33 PM
RE: Fun with domain names - by venam - 24-08-2020, 12:45 PM
RE: Fun with domain names - by jkl - 24-08-2020, 03:15 PM
RE: Fun with domain names - by z3bra - 25-08-2020, 10:24 AM
RE: Fun with domain names - by venam - 25-08-2020, 11:12 AM
RE: Fun with domain names - by z3bra - 25-08-2020, 11:36 AM
RE: Fun with domain names - by movq - 26-08-2020, 10:55 AM
RE: Fun with domain names - by venam - 26-08-2020, 11:16 AM
RE: Fun with domain names - by z3bra - 27-08-2020, 05:24 AM
RE: Fun with domain names - by venam - 27-08-2020, 05:41 AM
RE: Fun with domain names - by venam - 27-08-2020, 07:00 AM
|