Alternative programming languages and their usability on *nix - Programming On Unix
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
|
|||
(23-10-2020, 06:06 AM)jkl Wrote: The thread title is weird. "Alternative" programming languages, compared to what? You even suggested the relatively young (and not very interesting) Python to be a "traditional" language - compared to what? It is hard to name languages if their superset is undefined. Yeah, should've made myself more clear. By alternative I basically mean "not widely used". (23-10-2020, 06:06 AM)jkl Wrote: there is no reason for a third language between Go (client/server applications) and C (local applications) to exist. I kind of agree on this one, but in a different way. In a sense, Zig is a language to supercede C. Every program that is written in C can be rewritten in Zig because it's basically the same language, but with better syntax and a few more features while not being bloated and unnecessary like C++ or Rust. (23-10-2020, 06:06 AM)jkl Wrote: Unrelated side note: I wish I could understand APL better. APL looks efficient. APL looks awesome. |
|||
Messages In This Thread |
Alternative programming languages and their usability on *nix - by opfez - 23-10-2020, 04:36 AM
RE: Alternative programming languages and their usability on *nix - by jkl - 23-10-2020, 06:06 AM
RE: Alternative programming languages and their usability on *nix - by opfez - 23-10-2020, 06:18 AM
RE: Alternative programming languages and their usability on *nix - by jkl - 23-10-2020, 06:24 AM
RE: Alternative programming languages and their usability on *nix - by opfez - 23-10-2020, 07:00 AM
|