(01-08-2017, 05:31 PM)r4ndom Wrote: Isn't the dictionary missing in your implementation?

And do we create branches or are we working on master?

A lot of things are missing! Dictionnaries are next on my list. Actually, they're the same thing as lists, except that there is a relation between each pair of member. So the difference really stands in the usage you made of them, rather than how you store them. For reference, this commit adds the dictionnary parsing functionality :)

What needs to be implemented now is skimming through dictionnaries to find a specify key.

As you can see, I'm working directly on master. I prefer linear histories and rebasing commits upon merging is always a pain (also, stagit won't show the branch history, but that's another story). I'd advise you to work on master, unless you want to try a new feature that might not emd up on master (eg. it will be painful to rollback) or if you want to work separately for a later review (might be great if you're not confident enough in your code).

The end goal is to keep the master easy to browse, so people joining can easily replay the project history with "git log".