I've always used BSD 2-Clause aka the FreeBSD License, as it is (1) GPL compatible for those that care about such things (I don't) and (2) has a simple non-liability clause, which is really important as I once learned.

A few years back, the org I worked for at the time was dealing with a major issue where legal was doing an audit of our software licensing. At first, the legal team was trying to get in contact with the respective authors of our open-source licensed software, and ask them to issue us a special license removing the liability clauses, making the author legally liable if their software caused any major issues in our environment. As I'm sure you can imagine, they had a 0% success rate with that. The "reasoning" behind this was that Microsoft and Adobe offer liability and support, so everything else should.

After a few months of no progress, the lawyers gave up with the special license crap. For a while, we were afraid that we'd lose any access to open-source licensed software, but in the end legal gave up on OSS and focused on rich companies that would actually sign liability modifications. Regardless, it was a stressful ~6 months for IT/Dev.