Workflow Compilation 2020 [ongoing] - Desktop Customization & Workflow
z3bra
Here is my take: http://pub.z3bra.org/dev/random/workflow...-2020.webm

I do agree that this framerate is pretty fast indeed… We might need a way to slow down a few of them, so they don't last 10 seconds (looking at you jkl !). Because it goes so fast that you can barely figure out what is going on sometimes.
stark
(23-05-2020, 12:38 PM)z3bra Wrote: And this is a workflow video ! So if your workflow involves that, you better showcase it !

Exactly, writing random code is fine, but if you are not showcasing the tools that you ACTUALLY use in your day to day life, then's what's the point ? : )
stark
(23-05-2020, 10:11 AM)vain Wrote: Very well, next try:

https://dump.uninformativ.de/v/0cc081ec84/

Everything I do feels like it's 100% standard and boring, compared to the other vids. :)

Some bridges are boring to look at, but they work as they are intended to everytime : )
As long as it's true to your daily workflow, it's good.
jkl
(23-05-2020, 03:23 PM)stark Wrote: if you are not showcasing the tools that you ACTUALLY use in your day to day life, then's what's the point ? : )

See, the problem is that I don't have "one workflow"...

I actually use TECO, GNU Emacs, ed, nvi and Acme as text editors in my day to day life.

I actually use Fossil, Subversion, SCCS and a very limited set of Git commands in my day to day life.

I actually publish my code via WebDAV, GitHub Gists, forum attachments, IRC private messages (not joking), small (mine) and big (theirs) hosting facilities.

Had I known that only a limited subset of those was allowed in this compilation, I would have made a different video. I'd like the workflow judge to give a list of allowed workflows before I consider a second video that still does not fit the yet-to-be-listed rules.

edit: Fixed: I actually use more SVN than Darcs in 2020.
z3bra
I doubt stark's intervention was targetting you. It was more general pointer for people considering making a "cool" video rather than a real one.

Your video is fine, at least, by my standards, and I liked it ! It lacks the IRC part, but as you never join the serv, that would not be YOUR workflow. Don't make a new one, and stop bragging about how hipsterish your tools are ;)
jkl
(23-05-2020, 05:42 PM)z3bra Wrote: I doubt stark's intervention was targetting you.

My video is still missing in his list above.

(23-05-2020, 05:42 PM)z3bra Wrote: It lacks the IRC part, but as you never join the serv, that would not be YOUR workflow.

I'm always on the IRC, but I was banned on the nixers channel long ago. ;-)
But I even had the IRC part, it is in the last second of my video... you would have noticed if it would have been in real time ... :-D
z3bra
Ouch, indeed, it is in the very last seconds ^^
I guess you're too much of a fast typist for mere mortals to even notice you :P
jkl
That happens when you have a regular workflow... :-D
stark
(23-05-2020, 06:41 PM)jkl Wrote:
(23-05-2020, 05:42 PM)z3bra Wrote: I doubt stark's intervention was targetting you.

My video is still missing in his list above.

(23-05-2020, 05:42 PM)z3bra Wrote: It lacks the IRC part, but as you never join the serv, that would not be YOUR workflow.

I have asked 2 other participants in this thread to re-record because something was missing in their videos ( according to the task list ), and when they rectified it their videos were added to the list.

If I wanted everyone to upload their plain text file to a private web directory ( which does not classifies as a code repository on it's own ), I would have mentioned so ( even would have suggested some relevant services ) but I explicitly mentioned "public repo". None of the other participants have had any trouble understanding it and neither should you.
jkl
My WebDAV is publicly available, so it fits your requirement. But I understand that my workflow does not fit what you accept as a workflow, and I am not willing to continue this.

Edited.




Members  |  Stats  |  Night Mode