(03-10-2020, 12:01 PM)z3bra Wrote: Why bother caching images ? You have a good way to extract the <img> tag, so you could simply reuse it as-is, and rely on user's servers to serve the image. This would save both disk space, speed and processing power at every job run.

Damn, that is a great idea. I'm not too worried about processing power (most of the time no new images will be added), but who knows about disk space. If the images were srced directly from their origin, presumably this will be equivalent in terms of page-loading speed (assuming all servers have the same connectivity)?