(12-11-2020, 03:48 PM)jkl Wrote: Name your source. I doubt that.

It would actually be interesting to do a check on at least the top 10 Linux distro on distrowatch and see what is the default shell. That would definitely cover at least the most used distros.

(12-11-2020, 03:48 PM)jkl Wrote: My (non-code) text files are usually named according to their format - .org, .md, .txt are the extensions I use most. One of the reasons is that I also use Windows. :)

Always up to little snarky comments, but do you care to be more descriptive in your analyzes of why you find that adding the extension explicitly is more useful. I guess that you're referring to the visual aspect, towards the end-user.

Here's an additional thread: https://askubuntu.com/questions/803434/d...ing-system

One thing that wasn't brought are files which would be interpreted as another type if only based on the magic bytes/file signature, files like .doc for example would be interpreted as zip files.