Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
|
|||
I usually end up using bash. Is there and good reason I shouldn't?
|
|||
|
|||
I personally use zsh, loving some nice features that this shell offers (good auto-completion with tabbing), oh-my-zsh or better grml config.
|
|||
|
|||
zsh with oh-my-zsh.
|
|||
|
|||
Bash here, never seen the need for anything else. I must admit that the fish shell looks cool though.
|
|||
|
|||
I used bash forever and decided to use zsh with oh-my-zsh the other day. It's pretty much the same for me, I can't say it's really any faster. The colors for oh-my-zsh don't suit my white terminal tho
|
|||
|
|||
zsh for the completion, bash or scripting
|
|||
|
|||
Client-shell-of-choice still is bash. On servers: A wide variety, except zsh.
|
|||
|
|||
k
(30-07-2014, 07:22 PM)kirby Wrote: Bash here, never seen the need for anything else. I must admit that the fish shell looks cool though.That shell looks neat! I want to try other ones, so that'll be on the list. I've also heard good things about mksh, does anyone use that here? |
|||
|
|||
You should ask ypnose for that. Check out his blog also, its quitte Nice : http://blog.ypnose.org
|
|||
|
|||
bash had that bug tho. I use hush its very lightweight.
The world is quaking from our Linux Thoughts!
|
|||
|
|||
i use zsh. it seems like there's a completion system for everything. i also like the simple setup for thinks like keybindings, prompts, path expansions, extended glob searches, and it's own internal function system for thinks like git.
|
|||
|
|||
Fish (http://fishshell.com/)!
It's really cool. Offers a lot of improvements over bash like zsh but without the hours spent configuring it. |
|||
|
|||
i use zsh and bash for scripting on linux, bsd and osx
░ ░░▒░ ░ ░ ░ ▒ ░ ░▒ ▒░
░ ░ ░ ░ ░ ░ |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
zsh for looking pretty, mksh for everything else.
|
|||
|
|||
zsh on my personal machines, bash on servers or anything that comes by default on the OS.
|
|||
|
|||
Mostly bash for interactive use, but I (try) to write POSIX shell scripts (/bin/sh on my server is aliased to /bin/busybox, so ash by default)
|
|||
|
|||
I like to give users zsh for interactive stuff, for root-affairs always mksh.
With scripts it depends on the needs. Should it be portable -> /bin/sh. Should it be fancy -> zsh. In any other case I use bash for scripting, because it's easy to handle.
SpongeboZZ; Bikini Bottom Mafia/
You're cock-sucker, bitch/ silence while godfathers speech/ yeah/ da plancton in muh blunt/ gangster squarepants witha gun/ Sponge iz the bozz in da buiz/ you're creating silly trash/ i'm creating hollywood shit/ |
|||
|
|||
I use zsh with zsh-syntax-highlighting when I want to look good. oh-my-zsh is too heavy for me.
|
|||
|
|||
`which sh`
/bin/bash fuckyeah.jpg |
|||
|
|||
I personally use zsh, but came across someone using fish on http://usesthis.com and I looked it up. It looks good, how are you liking it?
--
Unix is user-friendly. It's just picky about who its friends are. |
|||
|
|||
Fish's design philosophy is absolutely horrendous.
|
|||
|
|||
zsh everywhere.
|
|||
|
|||
normal user: zsh / root: tcsh
|
|||
|
|||
ksh, because openbsd.
|
|||
|
|||
bash(1) because I'm to lazy to chsh(1) to anything else.
|
|||
|
|||
zsh(1) because of zim.
|
|||
|
|||
ksh93 everywhere because of POSIX.
-- <mort> choosing a terrible license just to be spiteful towards others is possibly the most tux0r thing I've ever seen |
|||
|
|||
rc, i love its syntax and it is my initials
|
|||
|
|||
i'm using bash. previously i used zsh with zim, which was handy, but for my needs, to much.
|
|||