links2 (textual) vs dillo (graphical)

Poll: Links2 or Dillo? You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Links2	8	88.89%
Dillo	1	11.11%
Total	9 vote(s)	100%

* You voted for this item.

[Show Results]

links2 (textual) vs dillo (graphical) - Desktop Customization & Workflow

Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)

	lee Offline \| 21-04-2013, 12:48 PM \| #1

IMO links2 is the winner. It just looks SO much cleaner.
I'd be glad to do more of these tests if anyone is interested.

-Lee

	venam Offline \| 21-04-2013, 01:28 PM \| #2

links2

	Mafia Offline \| 21-04-2013, 11:10 PM \| #3

(21-04-2013, 03:34 PM)NeoTerra Wrote: links2 by a long shot.

| DevArt - .IT |

	j0lly Offline \| 22-04-2013, 04:25 AM \| #4

(21-04-2013, 01:28 PM)venam Wrote: links2

is that the framebuffer version with gtk?
I used it for some times and run very well!

Have to say i never tried Dillo, but link2 is very powerful browser!

	venam Offline \| 22-04-2013, 06:20 AM \| #5

(22-04-2013, 04:25 AM)j0lly Wrote:
(21-04-2013, 01:28 PM)venam Wrote: links2

is that the framebuffer version with gtk?
I used it for some times and run very well!

Have to say i never tried Dillo, but link2 is very powerful browser!

gtk? What do you mean? This runs like that, in a framebuffer, without X.

	Okeg Offline \| 22-04-2013, 11:47 AM \| #6

w3m masterrace!

	zygotb Offline \| 22-04-2013, 05:47 PM \| #7

Links2 looks nicer.

	Mafia Offline \| 23-04-2013, 01:17 AM \| #8

(22-04-2013, 11:47 AM)Vizaari Wrote: w3m masterrace!

| DevArt - .IT |

	Dritz Offline \| 26-04-2013, 01:46 AM \| #9

I've used links2, dillo, and w3m.

links2 > w3m > dillo

I use 'links2 -g' all the time on my debian ancient computer. w3m is still nice for the textual simplicity when I'm reading a manual or something. I've heard some people use it for HTML parsing. Interesting...

"Willful ignorance is a crime"

View a Printable Version